By N.P. Upadhyaya
Kathmandu: At a time when the majority of the Nepali population, indeed a polarized one after the fake “revolutionary” changes brought about by the “India” sponsored and the exported 12 point agreement, appear to have been voting in favor of the Indian action on Kashmir, then at yet another plane some “India indoctrinated” political animals have begun to psychologically frighten the innocent and India tortured Nepali population by saying that the new Indian foreign minister shall denude the Nepali political animals if the latter played double with him.
It is the Indian congress lobby fitted into Nepali politics.
This scholar with highly presumed ‘India bend’ rants that in the past the Indian establishment have had endured the “double talks” of the ruling Nepali leaders, (he was specially talking of those leaders who were smart in rejecting Mr. Jaya Shankar’s “orders” for halting the promulgation of the new Constitution of Nepal sine die, however, the same Indian nationals in his new incarnation is shortly coming to Nepal and shall not allow the subservient rulers to play trick with him.
“This India bend intellectual claims that Mr. Shankar shall “assert” the Indian role in Nepal as if the day to day micro-management carried out by Indian envoy were not enough?
Does this intellectual, who generally speaks in favor of the Indian regime, wants to say the innocent Nepalese that if Nepal doesn’t listen to Shankar’s instructions this time when he lands in Nepal, yet another Economic blockade could be imposed?
Is this he wants to signal? If so then yes! Let the “elevated” Indian foreign minister be told in clear terms that Nepalese population will once again brave the Eco blockade if his corrupt brain so desires?
Let’s hope that this BJP card holder behaves this time with Nepal as is demanded and that too with a country that has never tasted slavery to what India tasted for centuries.
But FM Shankar should have the knowledge that the present day rulers in neighboring Nepal were the ones adjusted and later installed by the Indian establishment itself through the Shyam Saran phenomenon. Isn’t it Mr. Shankar? Just ask Mr. Saran.
If you behave as an honored guest and then we shall reciprocate more than what you deserve. But stop sending terrifying messages through your undeclared agents such as the one that has been published by an Indo-pendent daily that it is talked in the political circuit.
Some other India tilted brains, albeit crane elevated ones in the nation’s political sector, have taken the strong determination that they will leave no stone unturned in serving India and in the process have told a comfortable international gathering that “BIMSTEC should now be made the locomotive for the regional development by almost forgetting the SAARC”.
Or in other words this Nepali political man prefers to add strength to the Indian desire and preference that the SAARC be officially declared dead and that the BIMSTEC should and must replace the SAARC.
Unfortunately, the lobby which prefers BIMSTEC over SAARC is the same Indian brainwashed flock which is clearly and visibly toeing the line carried by PM Modi-the new Hitler of the South Asian region.
However, one former highly qualified Nepali Ambassador has told in clear terms that BIMSTEC can’t replace the SAARC. (Name withheld purposely: Ed).
This new Nazi leader in India, read PM Modi, has his millions of followers in Nepal albeit not taking his sides for free. Interestingly, with the advent of the last India sponsored “revolutionary change” of the 2005-6, the otherwise widely acclaimed “Bahadurs and Choukidars” of Nepal comfortably close to the Indian establishment have made it clear to India that they shall work for the Expansionist India only in lieu of Hefty Envelopes.
This should explain the rest as it is this envelope miracle which doesn’t allow the Nepalese to speak against India as and when the southern neighbor gulps our lands, inundates our villages and the Indian police enters deep inside the Nepali border and beats the innocent local population for no reasons. And our envelope leaders ignore the events as if nothing have happened.
The news that the BJP Card holder foreign minister of India is landing in Nepal, August 21, has shaken the innocent Nepalese in that it is these people who suffer each time when erratic Indian ministers come to Nepal.
But yet a few newsmen write against the visible Indian coercion just because India intervenes into Nepal’s Madhesh /Terai affairs. If India has this right then Nepal too deserves this right to intercede in the issues which have some impact on Nepal in some way or the other.
If India leaves us untouched then we too shall reciprocate.
It is these unwanted and even at times uninvited arrivals of the Indian ministers, bureaucrats and BJP functionaries to Nepal that this country had to necessarily gift something very substantial to that country for free which, as a matter of fact, has never been Nepal’s intimate friend-India.
The leaders who deposited the Mahakali River through parliamentary ratification to India are the ones who have been at the helm of affairs of this country enjoying, it is presumed, the blessings of India’s former foreign secretary Shyam Saran who damaged Nepal under the instructions of the then Indian “proxy” Prime Minister Dr. MM Singh.
PM Oli was extra active during Mahakali treaty ratification from the Nepali parliament, this scribe personally recalls.
Perhaps the party which damaged Nepal during the year 2005-6 has tentatively been decimated (The Indian Congress) by the Hitlerite party now which has been ruling India under “fascist” Prime Minister Narendra Bhai Modi.
That he is once again landing in Nepal any time soon has terrified the national population as he is, read PM Modi, the one whose notoriety the smaller neighbors understand better.
The former NOIDA dweller, comrade Prachanda who is being severely criticized for his spitting venom against King Gyanendra puzzled many a brains in Nepal and ultimately made a mockery of his own India raised personality. Prachanda now has valid reasons to get scared of the Hague Tribunal?
The fact is that Prachanda-the India elevated Maoists leader is so scared of his life that he has begun thinking that he may be taken to merciless task by some of his “fellow” riflemen posted in the Nepali jungles.
These illiterate but lured militias at times even looted banks in Nepal and collected the money for the benefit of the top leadership, read Prachanda, of the Maoists.
Dubai and Swiss banks have Prachanda’s deposited money in billions, it is in the rumor.
The overly used Maoists militias including child soldiers and the rejected rebel cadres are the ones who were likely to take “ghastly revenge” with their own top leadership who, as the militias think and conclude, that they had been cheated by their own top hats who were seated in New Delhi under Indian government’s protection and the low rung militia-men were fighting with the State on Prachanda’s behalf by being in the Nepali jungles.
It is this group along with hundreds of child soldiers (Lenin Bista for example) who have apparently been pleading the Hague Tribunal to provide justice to them by taking penal actions against the top leadership of the Maoists. Their main target is comrade Prachanda and Dr. Babu Ram Bhattarai and scores of others who have now been occupying the ministerial posts in Nepal PM Oli’s led government.
In all, Comrade Prachanda is scared of his life and under the spell of this fear for life Prachanda the other day initiated the tree plantation drive by sprinkling water in some plants and that too being right inside a big hall in Kathmandu. It was a shameful closed door plantation drive.
This not only looked nonsense but spoke the fear for life that has largely gripped this once ferocious upon his fresh arrival from Dubai.
He was in Dubai with his ailing wife in order to comfort his consort. Albeit, the Nepali State is talked to have footed the luxurious trip of Nepal’s Delhi preferred “revolutionary” Hero.
National exchequer is open for the “revolutionaries” in Nepal.
The heroes and builders of the imported republican order in Nepal have begun thinking what if the ousted Nepali monarch Gyanendra is reinstated? This has made them to have several sleepless nights. By the way, Congress general secretary Dr. Shashank Koirala is to meet King Gyanendra in Thailand, it is talked.
The fear is real in that not only the Hindu fundamentalists in neighboring India, including PM Modi and his UP lieutenant Chief Minister Yogi have made it a point that Nepal must not only have a Hindu King but also needs to be declared a Hindu State once again.
It is the prevalence of hundreds and thousands of Kings, small or big in size, in the entire country that the innocent and the tortured people of Nepal have begun to talk that the ousted monarch be restored.
But who shall restore the Monarch? The fact is that an India elevated monarch perhaps the common people shall reject. If so then how the monarch shall once again bounce back and occupy his throne? This is a complicated matter.
Yet the rumors say that King Gyanendra has not lost his high hopes and in the process has gone to Singapore wherein he is supposed to talk with some high officials from China and India.
Strong rumors say that the King is needed in Nepal because the present day leadership is incompetent to strike a “strategic balance” in between the Belt and Road Initiative of China and the Indo-Pacific Strategy of the USA.
Unconfirmed reports say that along with India and China, the US too is in favor of the reinstatement of the overthrown Monarchy in Nepal.
The fact is that India will not allow Nepal to go out from its sphere of influence. Similarly, China more or less has already entered into Nepal with more or less has some exclusive interests in Nepali politics which she has developed since 2008 or so. And here is the USA which clearly states that “Nepal can play a critical role for its Indo-Pacific Strategy.
This does mean that all these three great powers, the US, India and China, shall wish to see their individual political interests served by Nepal and given the Indo-pendent and saleable nature of Nepali leaders, what may have these countries in unison decided that a force which could ensure our respective interests to prevail must now be searched which neither could be sold nor would expectedly do injustice to their individual political interests in Nepal.
And who could be such a political persona other than the ousted monarch who has not only the political but diplomatic acumen to handle this sophisticated and complicated political scenario as and when it appears in the national scene?
The Indian aggression in Kashmir:
Now let’s talk of the Kashmir’s trauma.
Needless to say, Kashmir is the fresh target of Modi-Shah-Doval-Shankar clique.
Pakistan is yet to activate its diplomatic mission(s) worldwide and the Foreign Secretary or any other high ranking official who should have been traveling different neighboring capitals, including Kathmandu indeed, to take friends in confidence on Kashmir issue appear comfortable being in Islamabad.
Nepal is the current Chair of the SAARC and thus Nepal’s voice must be registered. Unfortunately, Nepal fears making any comments on Kashmir fearing yet another Indian Economic Blockade. But Nepal must speak.
To recall, Pakistan PM Imran Khan sought international help in solving the Kashmir issue. He said a few days back that the global community should intervene Modi government’s use of great military force against Kashmiris.
Pakistan PM Imran Khan has compared Modi’s move on Kashmir with those of Hitler’s Nazi ideology. He tweeted just the other day that, “The curfew, crackdown & impending genocide of Kashmiris in IOK is unfolding exactly according to the RSS ideology (which is) inspired by Nazi ideology.
In a just-natural development, the most popular French News Paper ‘Le Monde’ has made its headline 12 August quoting to what Imran Khan has rightly said of India.
The headline is titled “Le Pakistan compare la situation du cachemire indien a la montee du nazisme”.
Khan further says, “Attempts are being made to change the demography of Kashmir through ethnic cleansing. (And thus) question is: Will the world watch & appease as they did Hitler at Munich?”
UN chief Antonio Guterres on August 9 invoked the Shimla pact which said that Kashmir is a bilateral issue and that both the countries should refrain from taking any more steps in the matter.
It is a disputed territory recognized by the UN body itself.
Some Nepali observers say that the UN system is not that much effective in this case as it is the UN which has been dilly-dallying every time Pakistan approached the world body for redressal of their grievances. Is the UN body under pressure for conducting a promised plebiscite? If then from which country? Isn’t it India?
In the meanwhile, many Labor party leaders in Britain have spoken out against the communication blackout in Kashmir.
Britain, it should be noted, had always maintained that Kashmir is a bilateral issue to be solved by both India and Pakistan. As per the UN Security Council Resolution 47 adopted on April 21, 1948, both India and Pakistan were asked to resolve the crisis through a multi-step process. Accordingly, Pakistan was to withdraw all its nationals from the territory under its control and India was to reduce forces in its part of Kashmir which was to be followed by a plebiscite.
Remarkably, the leader of Opposition in the UK Parliament, Jeremy Corbyn, on Sunday, August 11, 2019, has expressed concern over the situation in Jammu & Kashmir. Claiming that the situation in the conflicted region has turned “deeply disturbing”, Corbyn said the resolutions issued by the United Nations should be implemented, inform some international media agencies.
“The situation in Kashmir is deeply disturbing. Human rights abuses taking place are unacceptable. The rights of the Kashmiri people must be respected and UN resolutions implemented,” Jeremy Corbyn said on social media outlets.
As the public debate in India remains divided over the Central government’s decision to strip Kashmir of its special status as well as bifurcate the state into two Union territories, a Pakistani defense expert and a former media man has said there are many sympathizers of Pakistan’s cause in India.
Mr. Mushahid Hussain, a Pakistani politician, journalist and a top class geo-strategist was appearing in a debate on Pakistani news channel Geo TV recently when he remarked that people like Indian writer Arundhati Roy, West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee and political parties like the Congress where “sympathizers” of Pakistan on the Kashmir issue.
When asked by the news anchor of the GEO TV about how the miseries of those in Kashmir will end, Hussain said confidently that though India was a large nation but yet not everyone supports Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
He is speaking correct. Perhaps the South Asian population loves to hate PM Modi Nepal included.
Mushahid says that Pakistan needs to take up the Kashmir issue in a serious but in a sustained manner. He further says while talking to the Geo TV that, “We will have to approach this [Kashmir] issue in a serious and sustained manner. And this is a long battle. India is a huge country. And many people from India are sympathizers with you also like Arundhati Roy, Mamata Banerjee, Congress party, Communist party, Dalit parties. All of India is not with Modi,” Hussain said.
In a fresh development, the Democratic Congressman Tom Suozzi has asked, August 12, 2019, the US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to make Kashmir a major focus of the Trump administration.
In a letter dated August 9, Congressman Suozzi alleged that the action by the Indian government “risks provoking mass social unrest”.
“These new restrictions on the autonomy of the state and the rights of Kashmiris could also embolden extremists and terrorists to act,” he wrote in the letter.
Suozzi represents the 3rd Congressional District of New York, of which Indian-Americans make up a significant number and had in fact played an important role in the election of Suozzi. Immediately after Pak FM’s visit to Beijing, the Indian foreign minister’s China visit followed.
After talks between Qureshi and his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi, Beijing announced that it will “uphold justice for Pakistan on the international arena.”
Islamabad also said Saturday, August 10, that it will take the Kashmir issue to the United Nations Security Council with Beijing’s support.
Maliha Lodhi too has become suddenly active at the UN. She has begun talking to some US TV Channels (Sky TV for example) and convincing the US people of the ground reality in Kashmir after Indian aggression.
She says in an official statement dated August 12 that “Pakistan calls upon the international community including the UN Human Rights machinery and other relevant bodies, to hold India to account for these deliberate crimes against religion, violations of international law and lack of respect for human decency”.
Thinking that Pakistan may have already influenced China in its favor, a jealous Indian foreign minister, (economic blockade specialist for Nepal) too rushed to Beijing to lure Wang Yi. However, the Chinese foreign ministry said it showed a “principled” stand on “unilateral” actions taken by India in a meeting between the two countries’ top diplomats, Mr. Shankar and Wag Yi, on Monday.
Senior Chinese diplomat Wang Yi said he hoped India would play a constructive role in regional peace and stability, reiterates a foreign ministry version.
Minister Wang is hoping against hope.
Wang Yi pointed out that India’s recent measures also challenged China’s sovereign rights and interests, contrary to the agreement between the two sides on safeguarding the border areas of the two countries.
“China is seriously concerned about this,” he said, adding that Indian measures will not change the fact that China exercises sovereignty over the relevant territory.
The Chinese foreign minister expressed his hope that New Delhi will take measures to promote mutual trust, peace and tranquility.
Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar told Wang that India was willing to exercise restraint and improve its relationship with Pakistan, the Chinese foreign ministry added, writes Reuters/Dawn from Beijing August 12/13, 2019.
All in all, India is being criticized worldwide and chances remain high that recent actions of India on Kashmir may backfire. That’s all.